Skip to main content

North Weald Redoubt: The London Defence Positions

The rivalry between France and Britain in the 1870’s again raised the fear of invasion. To meet such a threat, Colonel Ardagh laid out a defence scheme for the United Kingdom.  His key assumption was that an invading enemy’s objective was to be London. His scheme recommended garrisons for the defence of naval bases and commercial ports, a mobile field army concentrated in the south of England and all volunteer troops not required for the defence of ports or naval bases to occupy positions selected for the defence of London.  

The most likely landing place, where an army would only be a few days march from London, would be between Portsmouth and Harwich; the next best stretch of coast would be between Great Yarmouth to Harwich. Thus, the Field Army, covered by its cavalry and the Imperial Yeomanry, were to be distributed along a front stretching from Aldershot-Gravesend-Colchester. Behind this front, a second line of 10 main positions was to be manned by Volunteers organised into one division for each of the main positions. The entire line was to be entrenched and known as the London Defence Positions. 

.

Above: Map of the London Defence Positions showing the 10 main positions. The Guildford and Darenth Positions had entrenchments thrown out on the flanks (the Shire Extension and the Darenth Valley Extension). The outlying Wrotham entrenchment provided a link between the London Defence Positions and fortress Chatham.


However, in peace time only a number of small works were to be constructed. These small works were known as ‘Mobilisation Centres’ and were intended to keep in reserve the necessary tools and ammunition in peace time and used as tactical pivots in times of war. In the event of an invasion, the Volunteers allotted to the London Defence Positions were to concentrate at predetermined camping ground in the rear of the Positions. Their main duty would be to ensure the completion of their allotted positions for defence although the bulk of the entrenchment was to be carried out by civilian labour. The entrenchments had been designed for two Army Corps should the Field Army have to fall back on the Positions. It was anticipated that the Volunteers Divisions could be concentrated at the point the Field Army fell back on so that the maximum force available could meet the enemy.

The Redoubt

Where possible, the Mobilisation Centres utilised existing forts, but the North Weald Redoubt was a newly constructed fort, with work starting on it in 1889. It sits on commanding high ground to the southeast of the village of North Weald. It is ‘D’ shaped in profile. The front of the redoubt, semi-circular in profile, consists of a rampart behind which are sunken concrete casemates which were used to store ammunition and field artillery. The field guns would have been wheeled out of their casemates and positioned on the roof or prepared gun pits. 


Above: Magazines and gun casemates behind the defensive ramparts. 

The rear of the fort consists of ditch (now flooded) and a further row of concrete casemates which served as accommodation and stores. The ditch is defended by a caponier. The access to the fort was over the roof of the caponier, with two concrete pillars which would have had gates mounted on them.

.

Above: The rear ditch and line of concrete casemates.



Above: The caponier defending the ditch with access to the redoubt over its roof. 


Above: The entrance to the redoubt and the two concrete pillars which would have had gates mounted on them.

The Scheme allocated the 31st Volunteer Division to the North Weald Position. These Division was made up of the 4th or City of London Volunteer Brigade, the South Wales Border Volunteer Brigade and the Welsh Border Volunteer Brigade. Artillery formations allocated to the Position comprised of the 1st North Riding of Yorkshire RGA (Volunteers) with three 4.7” guns; the 2nd Lancashire RGA (Volunteers) with four 15pdr guns; and the 7th Lancashire RGA (Volunteers) with four 15pdr guns.

The Defence Scheme was declared obsolete in 1906, only to be resurrected during the Great War. Entrenchment began 1n 1915, carried out by the Territorials and the Volunteer Training Corps. With manpower shortages and the demands on Home Forces, progress was slow and the final trenches not completed until October 1918! A scheme was drawn up in 1915 to hold the London Defence Positions with five Special Infantry Brigades and one Reserve Artillery Brigade in the event of an emergency.







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Eastern Command Line - a lazy post

As the title suggests, just a lazy post today, a few pics of CRE Colchester design pillboxes in the Sudbury area to round of the thread on this May visit. Also one pic of concrete road block cylinders now being used as part of river bank defences. This is the first time I have come across this type of road block in Suffolk although I suspect it was probably used quite widely on this Stop Line, perhaps I will come across more examples / references in time. These pictures do show a timeless landscape - traditional floodplain meadows still used for grazing, with the Second World War clearly marking its presence. Lets just hope both the pillboxes and  grazing meadows will be preserved.

RAF Hethel Defence Post

At RAF Station Hethel, a remarkable defence post still exists.  Admittedly, RAF Hethel is in Norfolk and not Suffolk, but the records for this site do provide some interest in relation to the defence of airfields in Eastern Command. Work on Hethel began in 1941 and the station was opened late 1942 and was actually one of the RAF Stations handed over to the USAAF for the use of its bomber units. The defence post was constructed in accordance with a new policy adopted by Eastern Command. Previously, airfield defences had been built as a result of the Taylor Report and largely consisted of pillboxes and breastworks which were large and conspicuous and vulnerable to air attack. Experience at Crete had shown the need for small inconspicuous field works. The new defences were to now consist of small two man weapon-slits and small machine gun pits constructed in accordance with “Infantry Training, 1937” Supplement No.3 – “The design and lay-out of Field Defences, 1942”. Above...

Anti-tank ditch

December 31st Decided to visit the anti-tank ditch at Aldringham Walks this afternoon. It was constructed between late 1940 and early 1941 and ran from (north to south) Sizewell to the north of Thorpeness Mere. Some of its length is still visible today (see map and bottom photo)). The war diary of 9th Cameronians (15th Div) mentions the construction of the ditch in Margaret Wood (vicinity of No 12 Platoon, B Coy).  The diary also mentions a pillbox being destroyed by the RE in No 12 platoons area, but no luck in finding any remains this time. The diary would also indicate the ditch was a combined obstacle with Z1 scaffolding. The top left photo shows the remains of a weapons pit/shell slit; six pieces of angle iron revetment still exist - one of the pieces is clearly visible in the photo. Perhaps this is part of No 12 platoons position. Many years ago when beating up the young woodland I found a Yorkshire billhook with the WO arrow dated 1946, so this area would appear to have ...